Apocalypse Now: Who’s Responsible For Our Wildlife?
The Jakarta Globe
February 7, 2009
Opinion / Letters / Article
I am writing concerning your article on Feb. 1, 2009, by Arti Ekawati, “Perhutani Favors Lifting Ban on Teak Exports.”
If this ban was introduced to help combat illegal logging, what has now changed that makes Forestry Minister Kaban believe such logs can be exported within the law? Kaban is already on public record as showing his personal sympathy and support toward illegal loggers — quite why, one can only imagine — but this alone makes it hard to trust him when he shows such enthusiasm for shipping more of Indonesia’s natural heritage to far-off lands such as Japan.
And how can it be possible that the Ministry of Forestry, responsible as it is for selling off forests to the highest bidder, can also be responsible for protecting wildlife in the very same forests? If this is not a conflict of interest, what is? Millions of animals have died at the hands of the Ministry of Forestry. Hardly a day goes by without news of more forests being felled illegally, protected wild animals being killed or traded. Tens of thousands of orangutans alone have been killed on Kaban’s watch.
Would it not be more logical if the responsibility for taking care of
Sean Whyte,
Nature Alert chief executive
http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/opinion/article/8857.html